OTURare vs taxonomy

Hello,
I am using mothur to filter my shared file (made with mothur). I am using the filter.shared command and I think it works great. I understand that I need to create the OTURare to maintain the relative abundance across all OTUs. However, when I try to do taxonomic analysis, what do I do with this OTURare? should I assign it random taxa? Should I remove it? I am asking this because I need to have matching OTUs in the .shared and .taxonomy files to use the MicrobiomeAnlyst web tool. In advance, thanks for the help!

Regards,
Elliston

Hi Elliston - I would probably add a line to the cons.taxonomy file and give it the taxonomy of something like “Bacteria(100);Pooled(100);”

Pat

Hello,

Yes, that is exactly what I did and it kind of worked. I decided I will use the Mothur tools to do the analysis and then use R to graph everything.

On that note. I am getting weird values from the summary.single command (i.e. Simpson values higher than 1). Any idea why this might be happening?

Thanks,
Elliston

Are you possibly using invsimpson?

Never mind, I was using the wrong file. Sorry about that.

One last question. I am comparing the alpha diversity values from the summary.single command with the ones I have calculated using the R vegan package. The Shannon and invsimpson values are the same between the 2 programs, but they are not the same for the Simpson values. Any idea why this might be happening?

Thanks,
Elliston

This topic was automatically closed 10 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.