# summary.tax bug or user error?
**URL:** https://forum.mothur.org/t/summary-tax-bug-or-user-error/3114
**Category:** mothur bugs
**Created:** [February 6, 2017, 11:43pm UTC](https://forum.mothur.org/t/summary-tax-bug-or-user-error/3114 "2017-02-06T23:43:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@rlsimister](https://forum.mothur.org/u/rlsimister)
#### Post date: [February 6, 2017, 11:43pm UTC](https://forum.mothur.org/t/summary-tax-bug-or-user-error/3114/1 "2017-02-06T23:43:43Z")
Hi There,
I am looking at some cyanobacterial reads in my data. When i look through my taxonomy file, i notice that there are \>6000 sequences affiliated to:
Bacteria(100);Cyanobacteria(100);Cyanobacteria(100);SubsectionIII(100);FamilyI(100);Leptolyngbya(100)
However, in the summary.tax file the classification only goes to Family I level. I re-tired summary.tax with print level 6 but, the Leptolyngbya do not appear. Any ideas why: could this be an actual a bug or more likely user error?
Thanks,
---
### Author:  [@rlsimister](https://forum.mothur.org/u/rlsimister)
#### Post date: [February 7, 2017, 12:15am UTC](https://forum.mothur.org/t/summary-tax-bug-or-user-error/3114/2 "2017-02-07T00:15:45Z")
Hi all,
I just tried the summary.tax on my files on a labmates mac (mothur v1.37.3) and the the taxonomy file now summaries correctly (Leptolyngbya are in the tax.summary file).
In comparison i am using mothur on a linux v.1.39.0
Thanks,
---
### Author:  [@westcott](https://forum.mothur.org/u/westcott)
#### Post date: [February 10, 2017, 5:31pm UTC](https://forum.mothur.org/t/summary-tax-bug-or-user-error/3114/3 "2017-02-10T17:31:47Z")
Could you try version 1.39.1, [https://github.com/mothur/mothur/releases/tag/v1.39.1](https://github.com/mothur/mothur/releases/tag/v1.39.1)?